[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SCIGN-0051] blind test
- Subject: [SCIGN-0051] blind test
- From: Kurt Feigl, Toulouse
- Date: 3 Mar 1995 0:01:39
******************************************************************************
SCIGN Electronic Mail Fri Mar 3 0:01:39 PST 1995 Message Number 0051
******************************************************************************
Author: Kurt Feigl, Toulouse
Subject: blind test
In response to Keith Stark's message:
> On February 23rd, site personnel at UCLA were working with the
> monumentation at UCLP which may have inadvertently caused the antenna to be
> displaced as much as a few centimeters. We aplogize for not getting out a
> message earlier, but we were not notified of this change until this
> morning.
I am distressed that he had to be notified. This sort of signal should be
detected by the network itself.
I would suggest a *blind test*. I challenge the various processing
groups to analyse this day's data sequentially to determine *when* the
movement occurred, and its magnitude. If GPS is going to be useful
for ultra-long period seismology on scales of hours, it will have to
break the habit of one solution per day....
Playing the devil's advocate,
Kurt
**************************************************************
* Kurt Feigl Observatoire Midi Pyrenees *
* office: (33) 61 33 29 40 14, Ave. Edouard Belin *
* fax (33) 61 25 32 05 31400 TOULOUSE *
* E-mail: feigl@medoc.cnes.fr FRANCE (air mail!) *
**************************************************************
[Mailed From: Kurt FEIGL <feigl@medoc.cnes.fr>]